Tag Archives: Neil Gorsuch

Nevertheless…

I’ve written some not-very-complimentary things about Mitch McConnell, but when it came down to this Supreme Court nomination, he got the job done.

2017-04-07

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Hey, call me crazy

Yep, call me crazy, but I’d prefer a justice who always stands up for the law. If the law is sometimes at odds with the individual, and it seems like an injustice, don’t blame the the courts; blame the lawmakers for writing shoddy legislation. Unintended consequences can be a bitch.2017-03-31 (6).png

Update: In which Maria Cantwell admits she knew nothing about Neil Gorsuch’s judicial philosophy in 2006, but voted for him anyway. I’m glad she’s on the job, voting for stuff she doesn’t know anything about.

2017-03-31 (8).png

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, Washington

Unsurprisingly, Maria Cantwell reveals herself as a shameless partisan hack

maria cantwell

Oh, it looks like Maria is as tired of her partisan hackery as I am.

Of course we all know that Senator Maria Cantwell is a shameless partisan hack, so it’s no surprise when she confirms it as she did today.

…I cannot support cloture and will not support the confirmation of Judge Neil Gorsuch to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Judicial qualifications aside, Cantwell objects to the fact that Gorsuch doesn’t share her policy positions.

Don’t forget that when George W. Bush nominated Gorsuch to the federal bench in 2006, he was considered so non-controversial that he was confirmed by a unanimous voice vote of those present, including Maria Cantwell.

What a hypocrite.

 

3 Comments

Filed under Politics

Word games

Al Franken…what can I say. The words he says here make grammatical sense, but taken as a whole, what he’s saying is nonsensical.

2017-03-29

I would love to hear how Franken defines “consensus,” because it must be quite different from how I define it.

In point of fact, Merrick Garland was confirmed to the D.C. Circuit by a vote of 76 to 23, although honesty forces me to note that at least some of the “no” votes were probably motivated by the belief that the 11th seat was unneccessary.

Neil Gorsuch, on the other hand, was unanimously confirmed to the 10th Circuit by a voice vote of 98-0. He was so non-controversial that 12 current senators, including vocal opponents Chuck Schumer and Patty Murray, voted for him. Call me crazy, but that seems very consensus-like to me.

Democrats like to play word games. They change the meaning of words and repeat lies until they’re ground into the public consciousness and internalized as truth. If you don’t believe that, consider that at one point, 52% of Democrats believed Russia tampered with vote tallies in order to get Donald Trump elected President.2017-03-29 (2)Gosh, that couldn’t have had anything to do with the constant repetition by Democrat politicians and pundits that the election was “hacked.” Could it?

Word games. Al Franken is playing fast and loose with the meaning of consensus. He wasn’t a senator in 2006 so he won’t be a hypocrite like Patty Murray, but he’s still a shameless partisan hack.

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Unsurprisingly, Patty Murray reveals herself as a shameless partisan hack

Of course we all know that Senator Patty Murray is a shameless partisan hack, so it’s no surprise when she confirms it as she did today on Twitter.

2017-03-24

In case you’re wondering why this is such a first-rate example of her ideology of party over country, consider the fact that when George W. Bush nominated Gorsuch to the federal bench in 2006, he was considered so non-controversial that he was confirmed by a unanimous voice vote of those present, including Patty Murray.

So much for playing politics instead of considering the good of the country.

2 Comments

Filed under Patty Murray, Politics