If you’re okay with a 30% premium penalty for not maintaining continuous health care insurance coverage, you may not be as conservative as you think you are.
If you think it’s a-okay to have to report your health insurance information to the IRS, you may not be as conservative as you think you are.
If you agree that money isn’t fungible after all, as long as the House GOP says it’s not, you may not be as conservative as you think you are.
If you’re down with the government deciding which insurance plans can be offered, you may not be as conservative as you think you are.
If you think Health Savings Accounts are the perfect one-size-fits-all solution to all our health care insurance needs, you may not be as conservative as you think you are.
If you’re cool with having the government boot on your health care, you may not be as conservative as you think you are.
So overall, if you think the House GOP “repeal and replace”plan is better than Obamacare, you may not be as conservative as you think you are.
Thanks to my friend, Brandon, for his contributions to this post.
Yet another example of using the EPA to beat American businesses bloody and senseless.
Last week, Washington State junior U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell joined in the Obama administration’s curious war on American jobs. The newest target in Cantwell’s sights is a large proposed project in a sparsely populated corner of Southwest Alaska called the Pebble Mine, an undertaking to unearth rare natural resources that could provide thousands of well-paid jobs and millions in tax revenue to an area that is currently impoverished.
Even before the project has applied for permits, while plans for the Pebble Mine are being worked on and costly studies conducted, Cantwell has already requested the Environmental Protection Administration invoke subsection 404(c) of the Clean Water Act. Subsection 404(c) denies the disposal of dredge spoils or fill onto any land potentially draining into the nearby Kvichak and Nushagak Rivers.
The Pebble Partnership has already invested more than $120 million on environmental and socioeconomic studies associated with the Pebble Mine proposal, research that would be open to the scrutiny of the EPA, the Congress, environmental activists, and the public, if it were not for Cantwell’s move to preempt. They anticipate spending several times that amount by the time the 70 required state and federal permits have been obtained for the project. (Emphasis mine.)
How many millions can job creators be asked to forfeit before they take their toys and go somewhere else to play?